Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://gnanaganga.inflibnet.ac.in:8443/jspui/handle/123456789/10291
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAdam Clements-
dc.contributor.authorMichael Drew-
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-27T07:28:13Z-
dc.date.available2024-02-27T07:28:13Z-
dc.date.issued2009-
dc.identifier.urihttp://gnanaganga.inflibnet.ac.in:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/10291-
dc.description.abstractWe investigate whether the two zero cost portfolios, SMB a nd HML, have the abili ty to predict economic grow th for marke ts investigated in this paper. Our findings show tha t there a re only a limited number of cases w hen th e coefficients a re positive and sigmficance is achieved in an even more limited number of ca es. Our results a re in stark contrast to Liew and Vassalou (2000) who fi nd coefficients to be generally positive and of a similar ma gnitude. We go a s te p further an d also empl oy th e m e th o d o logy of Lakonishok, Shleife r and Vishny (1994) and once again fail to support the risk-based hypothesis of Liew and Vassalou (2000). In sum, we a rgue that search for a robust economic expla nation fo r firm size and book-to-market equity effec ts needs s ustai ned e ffort a th e e two zero cost portfolios do no t rep resent economically relevan t aggregate risk.-
dc.publisherFinance India-
dc.titleCan Book-To-Market and Size Be Risk Factors that Predict Economic Growth in Asias Emerging Economies?-
dc.volVol. 23-
dc.issuedNo. 4-
Appears in Collections:Articles to be qced



Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.