Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://gnanaganga.inflibnet.ac.in:8443/jspui/handle/123456789/14429
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Mohammad M. Amini | - |
dc.contributor.author | Michael Racer | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-03-02T06:27:44Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2024-03-02T06:27:44Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 1994 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://gnanaganga.inflibnet.ac.in:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/14429 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Statistical experimental design and analysis is a cornerstone for scientific inquiry that is rarely applied in reporting computational testing. This approach is employed to study the relative performance characteristics of the four leading algorithmic and heuristic alternatives to solve the Linear Cost Generalized Assignment Problem (LCGAP) against a newly developed heuristic, Variable-Depth Search Heuristic (VDSH). | - |
dc.publisher | Journal of the Institute of Management Sciences | - |
dc.subject | leading algorithmic and heuristic alternatives | - |
dc.subject | heuristic | - |
dc.subject | Variable-Depth Search Heuristic (VDSH). | - |
dc.title | A Rigorous Computational Comparison of Alternative Solution Methods for the Generalized Assignment Problem | - |
dc.vol | Vol. 40 | - |
dc.issued | No. 7 | - |
Appears in Collections: | Articles to be qced |
Files in This Item:
File | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|
A Rigorous Computational Comparison.pdf Restricted Access | 10.12 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open Request a copy |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.