Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://gnanaganga.inflibnet.ac.in:8443/jspui/handle/123456789/14822
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSupriyo Routh-
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-02T06:30:09Z-
dc.date.available2024-03-02T06:30:09Z-
dc.date.issued2010-
dc.identifier.urihttp://gnanaganga.inflibnet.ac.in:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/14822-
dc.description.abstractGlobalization gives rise to two apparently conflicting options for labor policy makers and advocates, both with social justice implications for workers. This articl.e argues that all international labor standards need not be (and should not be) adhered to by all devewping states. The international community shoul.d not mandate the religious adherence of international labor standards by all states under threat of sanctions via overlapping international organizations. Member states shoul.d be given l.eeway to a certain extent to determine the nature of labor standards that suit their necessities and l.evels of development. This shoul.d not be, however, taken to mean that the plight of the workers be made subject to the whim of a domestic political elite. The international community shoul.d secure minimum adherence to the labor standards by the member states through diplomatic and political channels, rather than enforcement of positive law through sanctions.-
dc.publisherJindal Global Law Review-
dc.subjectinternational organizations.-
dc.subjectinternational community.-
dc.titleGlobalizing Labor Standards- the Developed-Developing Divide-
dc.volVol. 2-
dc.issuedNo. 1-
Appears in Collections:Articles to be qced

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
Globalizing Labor Standards.pdf
  Restricted Access
982.78 kBAdobe PDFView/Open Request a copy


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.