Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://gnanaganga.inflibnet.ac.in:8443/jspui/handle/123456789/14823
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorJeremy Sarkin-
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-02T06:30:10Z-
dc.date.available2024-03-02T06:30:10Z-
dc.date.issued2010-
dc.identifier.urihttp://gnanaganga.inflibnet.ac.in:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/14823-
dc.description.abstractThe shift at the United Nations (U.N.) from the much criticized Human Rights Commission to the Human Rights Council in 2006 has supposedly brought new opportunities to affect the promotion and protection of human rights around the world. One of the major developments has been the implementation of the Universal Periodic Review (UPR) process to review the human rights (HR) situations in all UN. member countries on a regular basis. The extent to which it is having the desired effect still needs to be determined.-
dc.publisherJindal Global Law Review-
dc.subjectUniversal Periodic Review (UPR)-
dc.subjectcriticized Human Rights Commission.-
dc.titleHow to Better Infuse Gender Into the Human Rights Council's Universal Periodic Review Process?-
dc.volVol. 2-
dc.issuedNo. 1-
Appears in Collections:Articles to be qced

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
How to Better Infuse Gender.pdf
  Restricted Access
986.94 kBAdobe PDFView/Open Request a copy


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.