Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://gnanaganga.inflibnet.ac.in:8443/jspui/handle/123456789/14830
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorStephen P. Marks-
dc.contributor.authorNicholas Cooper-
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-02T06:30:13Z-
dc.date.available2024-03-02T06:30:13Z-
dc.date.issued2010-
dc.identifier.urihttp://gnanaganga.inflibnet.ac.in:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/14830-
dc.description.abstractThis article argues that the responsibility to protect (R2P) is not a radical departure on the role ofinternational community regarding mass atrocities, but a codification ofpre-existing concepts of Just war'and humanitarian intervention, and a call to ensure their consistent application. The authors highlights holistic approach of preventing, reacting to, and rebuilding after grave crimes are committed,treating impunity and its redressal as a process rather than stand alone events. This article concludes with political hurdles for R2P to be realised in action and suggest creative ways to overcome them.-
dc.publisherJindal Global Law Review-
dc.subjecthumanitarian intervention-
dc.subjectmass atrocities.-
dc.titleThe Responsibility to Protect- Watershed Or Old Wine in a New Bottle?-
dc.volVol. 2-
dc.issuedNo. 1-
Appears in Collections:Articles to be qced

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
The Responsibility to Protect.pdf
  Restricted Access
2.17 MBAdobe PDFView/Open Request a copy


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.