Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://gnanaganga.inflibnet.ac.in:8443/jspui/handle/123456789/1547
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKevin J. Clancy, Paul D. Berger-
dc.date.accessioned2023-10-06T07:05:22Z-
dc.date.available2023-10-06T07:05:22Z-
dc.date.issued2012-
dc.identifier.urihttp://gnanaganga.inflibnet.ac.in:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/1547-
dc.description.abstractFor many years, marketers have studied the determinants of brand choice for products and services. The most common approach has been to ask respondents to "self-report" the importance of many product/service attributes and benefits in a product-category. It later became clear that in many cases, what respondents said was important was not reflected in their brand choices. To help them overcome this weakness, an indirect measurement approach, called Derived- Importance, became a popular way to assess the influence of attributes/benefits on brand-choice or customer-satisfaction. Many of the "statistics" purporting to measure derived-importance have serious problems; these problems are discussed in this paper.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherIndian Journal of Marketingen_US
dc.subjectDerived Importanceen_US
dc.subjectBrand Strategyen_US
dc.subject, Product Strategyen_US
dc.titleProblems with Derived Importance Measures in Brand Strategy and Customer Satisfaction Studiesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:Article Archives

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Problems With Derived Importance Measures In Brand.pdf
  Restricted Access
Problems With Derived Importance Measures In Brand2.74 MBAdobe PDFView/Open Request a copy


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.