Use of Alternative Dispute Resolution methods for effective consumer protection: A Critical Analysis

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://gnanaganga.inflibnet.ac.in:8443/jspui/handle/123456789/5476

Full metadata record

DC Field	Value	Language
dc.contributor.author	Hotur, Sree Krishna Bharadwaj	-
dc.date.accessioned	2024-01-31T09:25:44Z	-
dc.date.available	2024-01-31T09:25:44Z	-
dc.date.issued	2017	-
dc.identifier.citation	Vol. 3, No. 1; pp. 42-57	en_US
dc.identifier.issn	2454-8553	-
dc.identifier.issn	2583-8644	-
dc.identifier.uri	https://doi.org/10.60143/ijls.v3.i1.2017.51	-
dc.identifier.uri	http://gnanaganga.inflibnet.ac.in:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/5476	-
dc.description.abstract	Dispute resolution has two prominent categories, namely Adversarial and Non-Adversarial i.e. Adjudicatory and Non-Adjudicatory. One of the most formal methods is Adversarial which includes trial and arbitration. This method, by virtue of being the most formalized methods, is also the most widely used methods of dispute resolution.2 The Non-Adjudicatory methods of dispute resolution include Negotiation, Mediation, Conciliation, and Lok Adalat.	en_US
dc.language.iso	en	en_US
dc.publisher	International Journal of Law and Social Sciences	en_US
dc.publisher	Alliance School of Law, Alliance University	en_US
dc.subject	Dispute Resolution	en_US
dc.subject	Consumer Protection	en_US
dc.subject	Methods of Dispute Resolution	en_US
dc.subject	Adversarial and Non- Adversarial Process	en_US
dc.title	Use of Alternative Dispute Resolution methods for effective consumer protection: A Critical Analysis	en_US
dc.type	Article	en_US
Appears in Collections:	IJLS - Vol 3, Issue 1 2017

Files in This Item:

File	Size	Format
Use-of-Alternative-Dispute-Resolution-methods.pdf	743.56 kB	Adobe PDF	View/Open

Alliance University, Bengaluru