Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://gnanaganga.inflibnet.ac.in:8443/jspui/handle/123456789/5483
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Ranaware, Vishal | - |
dc.contributor.author | Shelar, Amol | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-01-31T09:25:57Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2024-01-31T09:25:57Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2018 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Vol. 4, No. 1; 9p. | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 2454-8553 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 2583-8644 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.60143/ijls.v4.i1.2018.58 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://gnanaganga.inflibnet.ac.in:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/5483 | - |
dc.description.abstract | The traditional role of public policy was to limit the scope of foreign law, recognition, and enforcement of foreign judgments or awards. Sometimes domestic courts use this doctrine to strike down the foreign arbitral awards. Though the disputing parties are free to choose applicable laws in international commercial arbitration, when it comes to the recognition and enforcement of an award they rely on the domestic laws and courts. If the court thinks that an award before them deals with a matter violates public policy, the court may refuse to recognise and enforce it. There is no uniformity in public policy notion among the states, it has been interpreted in different ways in different jurisdictions so it becomes very difficult to say which award will be allowed and which will violate the principle. Therefore, it becomes a big hurdle in the way of international commercial arbitration. To deal with this issue Indian judiciary took a step to define it and limit the scope doctrine of public policy. Finally, in 2015 Indian Parliament amended the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, and clarified the term ‘public policy’. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | International Journal of Law and Social Sciences | en_US |
dc.publisher | Alliance School of Law, Alliance University | en_US |
dc.subject | Public Policy | en_US |
dc.subject | International Commercial Arbitration | en_US |
dc.subject | The Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 | en_US |
dc.subject | Party Autonomy | en_US |
dc.subject | Arbitral Award | en_US |
dc.subject | Renusagar | en_US |
dc.title | Public Policy a Hurdle Under the Indian Arbitration Law: Critical Analysis | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
Appears in Collections: | IJLS - Vol 4, Issue 1 2018 |
Files in This Item:
File | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|
Public-poilcy-a-hurdle-under-the-indian-arbitration-law.pdf | 287.71 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.