Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://gnanaganga.inflibnet.ac.in:8443/jspui/handle/123456789/6219
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAli Ashraf-
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-27T05:54:56Z-
dc.date.available2024-02-27T05:54:56Z-
dc.date.issued2014-
dc.identifier.urihttp://gnanaganga.inflibnet.ac.in:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/6219-
dc.description.abstractUsing a regime switching model, this study analyzes the nature of gold hedging benefus from the perspective of an individual investor who may choose to invest in a portfolio of- a) Index Futures, b) T-note Futures, c) Oil Futures and d) Gold Futures. Empirical.findings support the argument that two distinctive identifiable regimes of gold futures returns exist: 1) a negative return with higher volatility regime and 2) a positive return with lower volatility regime. Between the two regimes, hedging benefits of gold are more pronounced during the higher volatility regimes when compared with the index-fuJures that represent the overall market. When other Tbond future, AAA Bond and CCC Bond index returns are considered as benchmarks, we find similar evidence consistent with this argument. We also compare the hedge benefits for the gold futures during the 2008 financial crisis; results suggest that hedge benefits for gold futures are more pronounced in both the regimes during the financial crisis when compared with futures returns in other non-financial crisis sample.-
dc.publisherThe Global Journal of Finance and Economics-
dc.titleHedging Benefits of Gold Futures- A Regime Switching Model Approach-
dc.volVol 11-
dc.issuedNo 2-
Appears in Collections:Articles to be qced

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
HEDGING BENEFITS OF GOLD FUTURES.pdf
  Restricted Access
1.16 MBAdobe PDFView/Open Request a copy


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.