Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://gnanaganga.inflibnet.ac.in:8443/jspui/handle/123456789/975
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorRajiv Khosla-
dc.date.accessioned2023-09-06T10:38:30Z-
dc.date.available2023-09-06T10:38:30Z-
dc.date.issued2019-
dc.identifier.urihttp://gnanaganga.inflibnet.ac.in:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/975-
dc.description.abstractAll the macroeconomic indicators for the Indian economy that are responsible for giving impetus to growth are pointing south. Some indicators like tax growth (at 20 years low), investment growth (at 17 years low), power (electricity) demand (at 12 years low), GDP (at 11 years low), and private consumption (at 7 years low) etc. have seen their stumpy growth in as much as a decade or two. It is argued that the fiscal stimulus provided by the government is misdirected towards the supply side, and it can yield results only after a time lag. Contrarily, demand side allocations through MGNREGA, PM-KISAN, and MUDRA moratorium could have yielded results in a shot span of time. The present study attempted to demystify the riddle if investment led demand or demand led investment could have offered favorable outcomes in a shorter time span.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherArlhshastra Indian Journal of Economics & Researchen_US
dc.subjectInvestmenten_US
dc.subjectDemanden_US
dc.subjectRiddleen_US
dc.titleDebating Investment Led Demand and Demand Led Investmenten_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:Article Archives

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Debating Investment Led Demand and Demand Led.pdf
  Restricted Access
Debating Investment Led Demand and Demand Led2.12 MBAdobe PDFView/Open Request a copy


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.