Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://gnanaganga.inflibnet.ac.in:8443/jspui/handle/123456789/13521
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHaipeng (Allan) Chen-
dc.contributor.authorAkshay R. Rao-
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-27T09:22:40Z-
dc.date.available2024-02-27T09:22:40Z-
dc.date.issued2007-
dc.identifier.urihttp://gnanaganga.inflibnet.ac.in:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/13521-
dc.description.abstractWhen evaluating the net impact of a series of percentage changes, we predict that consumers may employ a "whole number" computational strategy that yields a systematic error in their calculation. We report on three studies conducted to examine this issue. In the first study we identify the computational error and demonstrate its consequences. In a second study, we identify several theoretically driven boundary conditions for the observed phenomenon.-
dc.publisherJournal of Consumer Research-
dc.titleWhen Two Plus Two is Not Equal to Four- Errors in Processing Multiple Percentage Changes-
dc.volVol. 34-
dc.issuedNo. 3-
Appears in Collections:Articles to be qced

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
When Two Plus Two Is Not Equal to Four.pdf4.79 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.