Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://gnanaganga.inflibnet.ac.in:8443/jspui/handle/123456789/13521
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Haipeng (Allan) Chen | - |
dc.contributor.author | Akshay R. Rao | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-02-27T09:22:40Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2024-02-27T09:22:40Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2007 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://gnanaganga.inflibnet.ac.in:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/13521 | - |
dc.description.abstract | When evaluating the net impact of a series of percentage changes, we predict that consumers may employ a "whole number" computational strategy that yields a systematic error in their calculation. We report on three studies conducted to examine this issue. In the first study we identify the computational error and demonstrate its consequences. In a second study, we identify several theoretically driven boundary conditions for the observed phenomenon. | - |
dc.publisher | Journal of Consumer Research | - |
dc.title | When Two Plus Two is Not Equal to Four- Errors in Processing Multiple Percentage Changes | - |
dc.vol | Vol. 34 | - |
dc.issued | No. 3 | - |
Appears in Collections: | Articles to be qced |
Files in This Item:
File | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|
When Two Plus Two Is Not Equal to Four.pdf Restricted Access | 4.79 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open Request a copy |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.