Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://gnanaganga.inflibnet.ac.in:8443/jspui/handle/123456789/14429
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMohammad M. Amini-
dc.contributor.authorMichael Racer-
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-02T06:27:44Z-
dc.date.available2024-03-02T06:27:44Z-
dc.date.issued1994-
dc.identifier.urihttp://gnanaganga.inflibnet.ac.in:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/14429-
dc.description.abstractStatistical experimental design and analysis is a cornerstone for scientific inquiry that is rarely applied in reporting computational testing. This approach is employed to study the relative performance characteristics of the four leading algorithmic and heuristic alternatives to solve the Linear Cost Generalized Assignment Problem (LCGAP) against a newly developed heuristic, Variable-Depth Search Heuristic (VDSH).-
dc.publisherJournal of the Institute of Management Sciences-
dc.subjectleading algorithmic and heuristic alternatives-
dc.subjectheuristic-
dc.subjectVariable-Depth Search Heuristic (VDSH).-
dc.titleA Rigorous Computational Comparison of Alternative Solution Methods for the Generalized Assignment Problem-
dc.volVol. 40-
dc.issuedNo. 7-
Appears in Collections:Articles to be qced

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
A Rigorous Computational Comparison.pdf
  Restricted Access
10.12 MBAdobe PDFView/Open Request a copy


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.